Skip to content

Government case study

Workflow automation for PERKESO

Innolytic built workflow automation for PERKESO covering case distribution by officer capacity, rule-based approvals with a quality-review queue, and automatic reminders and deadline checks. The work is named with PERKESO's consent. This page describes the capabilities delivered and publishes no performance figures or internal system details.

Client
PERKESO (Social Security Organisation)
Sector
Government social security
What we delivered
Workflow automation system
Abstract cards sorted into orderly lanes, representing fair case distribution

What was the challenge?

A national employment insurance service handles a steady flow of applications, claims and payments. Each one has to reach the right officer, follow the policy in force on its date and be paid exactly once.

Doing that by hand means officers chasing assignments, checking the same rules repeatedly and tracking deadlines in their heads. Policy changes add risk, because old and new cases follow different rules.

How did we approach it?

  1. Intake
  2. Assign
  3. Review
  4. Payment

We modelled the work as a set of rule-driven workflows: intake, assignment, review and payment, with every automatic decision recorded and every exception routed to a person.

Policy values sit in a versioned rules engine instead of the code, and long-running steps such as reminders and payment status checks run in a durable workflow engine that survives restarts and outages.

What does the system do?

  • Fair case distribution

    Cases rotate across eligible officers by role, branch, workload and approval limits, with a daily auto-assign and a sweeper for unassigned work.

  • Priority routing

    Cases from high-volume employers go to a dedicated group first and fall back to the national pool.

  • Letter automation

    Letters approve automatically when the response window passes, with follow-up monitoring and batch extension checks.

  • Approval with review

    Straightforward applications are approved automatically, and looser approvals are queued for headquarters review.

  • Duplicate checks

    Payments matching an earlier one on holder, transaction, case and person are held before payout.

  • Versioned rules

    Allowances, rates, limits and required documents change by version and start date, without a code release.

  • Reliable workflows

    Reminders, service-level timeouts, payment gap detection and bank status sync resume after any interruption.

  • Eligibility checks

    Eligibility is confirmed against external government systems, with retries and safe fallback.

  • Document-ready data

    A structured model stores document reading status and results, ready for an OCR engine.

What changed?

  • Officers receive work automatically instead of picking it from a shared list.
  • Policy changes are made by administrators, with past cases kept on their original rules.
  • Every automatic decision is recorded with the rule that triggered it.
  • Payments are checked for duplicates before money leaves.

Related solutions

Common questions

What did Innolytic build for PERKESO?

Workflow automation for case distribution, approvals with quality review, letter deadlines, duplicate payment checks, versioned rules and reliable reminders.

How does the system make decisions?

It is rule-based workflow automation. Every decision follows rules the organisation sets and can read, and exceptions go to a person.

Can I see the system?

No. Internal screens and details are not published. The capabilities are described on the solutions pages.

Can my agency get something similar?

Yes. Each capability can be scoped for your organisation. Talk to us to start.

Have a process you want to automate?

Tell us how the work runs today. We will reply with the next step and a quote in RM.